<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>mosshaselhurst Solicitors</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mosshaselhurst.com/blog/?feed=rss2" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mosshaselhurst.com/blog</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 22:29:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>CoA judge raps defendant for spurning mediation</title>
		<link>http://mosshaselhurst.com/blog/?p=726</link>
		<comments>http://mosshaselhurst.com/blog/?p=726#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 22:29:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Emma Roberts</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court of Appeal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indesit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mediation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mosshaselhurst]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mosshaselhurst.com/blog/?p=726</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A Court of Appeal judge has criticised a defendant for rejecting mediation offered at a previous hearing &#8211; warning it will be a costly decision. Lord Justice Longmore said it was a ‘great pity’ that appliance supplier Indesit, instructed by Plexus Solicitors, had not pursued the option of mediation as advised by Lord Justice Toulson [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A Court of Appeal judge has criticised a defendant for rejecting mediation offered at a previous hearing &#8211; warning it will be a costly decision.</p>
<p>Lord Justice Longmore said it was a ‘great pity’ that appliance supplier Indesit, instructed by Plexus Solicitors, had not pursued the option of mediation as advised by Lord Justice Toulson in a personal injury case. Indesit had successfully defended a personal injury claim by employee Ali Ghaith, but Ghaith was subsequently given permission to appeal.</p>
<p>It was then that the appeal judge encouraged Indesit to pursue the option of mediation.</p>
<p>The company opted not to follow that advice on the grounds that costs had already exceeded the likely amount at issue. In a judgment given today, LJ Longmore said this was an ‘inadequate response’ that will ‘inevitably result in a substantial increase in costs’.</p>
<p>He added: ‘Indesit’s reaction is all too frequent and the court has, since April of this year, decided that any claim for less than £100,000 will be the subject of compulsory mediation.</p>
<p>‘It is devoutly to be hoped that such mediation will mean that these comparatively small claims will not have to be adjudicated by this court so frequently in future.’</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mosshaselhurst.com/blog/?feed=rss2&#038;p=726</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Apprenticeship scheme for legal services</title>
		<link>http://mosshaselhurst.com/blog/?p=720</link>
		<comments>http://mosshaselhurst.com/blog/?p=720#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 18:40:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Emma Roberts</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[charity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[College of Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[London]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[London Apprenticeship Company]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mosshaselhurst solicitors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Skills for Justice]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mosshaselhurst.com/blog/?p=720</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The first legal services apprenticeships are to be made available from next year to employers seeking skilled paralegal and other legal support staff. The London Apprenticeship Company (LAC) announced today that it had teamed up with charity Skills for Justice to place young people into apprenticeships within the legal services sector. The charity, which has [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The first legal services apprenticeships are to be made available from next year to employers seeking skilled paralegal and other legal support staff.  The London Apprenticeship Company (LAC) announced today that it had teamed up with charity Skills for Justice to place young people into apprenticeships within the legal services sector.  The charity, which has College of Law chief executive Nigel Savage on its board, aims to identify the key skills issues for legal services and to help employers and individuals to become better skilled. It also works to influence policy makers to take into account the skill needs of the legal services sector.</p>
<p>mosshaselhurst Solicitors</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mosshaselhurst.com/blog/?feed=rss2&#038;p=720</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fire destroys Millionaire’s eco-friendly chalet</title>
		<link>http://mosshaselhurst.com/blog/?p=721</link>
		<comments>http://mosshaselhurst.com/blog/?p=721#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2012 15:39:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jeannette Kemp</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chalet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eco-friendly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mansion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[millionaire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mosshaselhurst solicitors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Poole Harbour]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mosshaselhurst.com/blog/?p=721</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A millionaire who won a planning battle to build an eco-friendly island hideaway home has seen his dreams go up in smoke after the six-bedroom timber chalet was destroyed by fire. It had taken the last two years to build the £4 million retreat, made from cedar wood and equipped with solar panels on Green [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A millionaire who won a planning battle to build an eco-friendly island hideaway home has seen his dreams go up in smoke after the six-bedroom timber chalet was destroyed by fire.  </p>
<p>It had taken the last two years to build the £4 million retreat, made from cedar wood and equipped with solar panels on Green Island in Poole Harbor. The Island was bought for £2.5 million in 2005.</p>
<p>The Owners plans for the building were rejected by Purbeck District Council in 2009 – even though there were no objections and the design had been praised by conservationists!  A planning appeal allowed the development to go ahead the following year.</p>
<p>The house, which was to be powered by solar panels and diesel generators, and use log burners, was nearly completed when the blaze was reported last week.</p>
<p>Flames spread quickly through the log-walled three-storey building as the blaze took hold on its two upper floors before an atrium collapsed.  The Millionaire who owns has pledged that it will be re-built.</p>
<p>mosshaselhurst Solicitors</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mosshaselhurst.com/blog/?feed=rss2&#038;p=721</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cautious welcome for Children and Families Bill</title>
		<link>http://mosshaselhurst.com/blog/?p=718</link>
		<comments>http://mosshaselhurst.com/blog/?p=718#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2012 21:35:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Emma Roberts</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[familiy lawyers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Family Justice Review.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[governement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mosshaselhurst solicitors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Queens Speech]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mosshaselhurst.com/blog/?p=718</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Legislation heralded in the Queen’s speech to reduce delays in the family justice system needs to be matched with the resources to make it a reality, family lawyers have warned Lawyers broadly welcomed the announcement of a Children and Families Bill, but cautioned that its measures would be hard to implement when all parts of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Legislation heralded in the Queen’s speech to reduce delays in the family justice system needs to be matched with the resources to make it a reality, family lawyers have warned  Lawyers broadly welcomed the announcement of a Children and Families Bill, but cautioned that its measures would be hard to implement when all parts of the family justice system face budget cuts.  The bill will take up many of the reforms proposed by the government in February in its response to last November’s Family Justice Review.  </p>
<p>Key measures will include a six-month statutory time limit for the completion of care cases; requiring parents to consider resolving disputes using mediation; and the introduction of ‘shared parenting’ principle to help ensure children maintain a relationship with both their parents after family separation.  The government will consult shortly on how legislation ‘can be framed to ensure that a meaningful relationship is not about an equal division of time but the quality of time that a child spends with each parent’.</p>
<p>mosshaselhurst Solicitors</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mosshaselhurst.com/blog/?feed=rss2&#038;p=718</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Queen’s speech ushers in era of cameras in court</title>
		<link>http://mosshaselhurst.com/blog/?p=716</link>
		<comments>http://mosshaselhurst.com/blog/?p=716#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2012 22:25:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Emma Roberts</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cameras in Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mosshaselhurst solicitors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Queens Speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tribunals]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mosshaselhurst.com/blog/?p=716</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[News broadcasters have hailed the permitting of cameras in court for the first time as &#8216;an important step for democracy and open justice&#8217;. The lifting of the ban was confirmed as part of the Queen&#8217;s speech today and allows for judgments to be filmed and broadcast. In a speech that focused heavily on justice issues, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>News broadcasters have hailed the permitting of cameras in court for the first time as &#8216;an important step for democracy and open justice&#8217;. The lifting of the ban was confirmed as part of the Queen&#8217;s speech today and allows for judgments to be filmed and broadcast.  In a speech that focused heavily on justice issues, the Queen also outlined reform of the courts and tribunals service to &#8216;increase efficiency, transparency and judicial diversity&#8217;.</p>
<p>Many of the changes form part of the Crime and Courts Bill, which the government promises will modernise the criminal justice system. The Ministry of Justice wants to &#8216;demystify&#8217; the court process, but insists there will be no broadcasting of witnesses, victims or defendants.</p>
<p>mosshaselhurst Solicitors</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mosshaselhurst.com/blog/?feed=rss2&#038;p=716</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Strikes and work to rule will hit courts from Thursday</title>
		<link>http://mosshaselhurst.com/blog/?p=714</link>
		<comments>http://mosshaselhurst.com/blog/?p=714#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2012 21:11:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Emma Roberts</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[August]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mosshaselhurst solicitors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pensions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public sector]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[strike]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mosshaselhurst.com/blog/?p=714</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hundreds of court staff will refuse overtime until August as the public sector pensions row threatens to create a backlog in the court service. Members of the Public and Commercial Services Union are due to walk out on Thursday for a one-day strike over cuts to their pensions. The union has also confirmed that members [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hundreds of court staff will refuse overtime until August as the public sector pensions row threatens to create a backlog in the court service.  Members of the Public and Commercial Services Union are due to walk out on Thursday for a one-day strike over cuts to their pensions. The union has also confirmed that members will work to rule until 31 July, refusing requests to work overtime.</p>
<p>The Law Gazette revealed earlier this year that 1,200 posts had been cut by HM Courts and Tribunals Service. The union aims to expose managers’ reliance on staff increasing their workloads to cover shortages.  Last summer, the service relied heavily on overtime workers to cope in the aftermath of the August riots and any repeat in the next two months would put severe pressure on courts.  Stakeholders were warned by HMCTS this week to expect priority to be given to urgent business if the strike goes ahead.</p>
<p>mosshaselhurst Solicitors</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mosshaselhurst.com/blog/?feed=rss2&#038;p=714</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Clarke asks top judges to probe disclosure sanctions</title>
		<link>http://mosshaselhurst.com/blog/?p=708</link>
		<comments>http://mosshaselhurst.com/blog/?p=708#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2012 21:37:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Emma Roberts</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[criminal trial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judges]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[justice secretary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kenneth Clarke]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mosshaselhurst solicitors]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mosshaselhurst.com/blog/?p=708</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Justice secretary Kenneth Clarke has asked two senior judges to review sanctions for disclosure failures in criminal trials, to ‘mitigate the resource burden’ imposed by disclosure. Lord Justice Gross and Mr Justice Treacy will consider whether current sanctions and judicial case management powers are adequate to secure compliance with disclosure duties, and whether there are [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Justice secretary Kenneth Clarke has asked two senior judges to review sanctions for disclosure failures in criminal trials, to ‘mitigate the resource burden’ imposed by disclosure.</p>
<p>Lord Justice Gross and Mr Justice Treacy will consider whether current sanctions and judicial case management powers are adequate to secure compliance with disclosure duties, and whether there are options for strengthening them. The move follows an earlier year-long review, Disclosure in Criminal Proceedings, conducted by Gross and published in September 2011, which concluded that there is no ‘quick fix’ to the concerns.</p>
<p>Announcing the new review, Clarke said: ‘The continuing policy objective in this important area is to safeguard fair trials by ensuring the legal framework requires appropriate disclosure to the accused.’ But he said the ‘resource burden’ which the arrangements impose on the criminal justice system ‘cannot be ignored’. </p>
<p>mosshaselhurst Solicitors</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mosshaselhurst.com/blog/?feed=rss2&#038;p=708</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Double Dip Recession  Fears for Housing Market</title>
		<link>http://mosshaselhurst.com/blog/?p=710</link>
		<comments>http://mosshaselhurst.com/blog/?p=710#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2012 17:05:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jeannette Kemp</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Britain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[house prices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mosshaselhurst solicitors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[newspapers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mosshaselhurst.com/blog/?p=710</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Newspapers are reporting that Britain has officially returned to recession. Straight away, speculation has focused on fears for house prices saying that consumer confidence is already weak and that this news will damage it even further. Such doom and gloom is not consistent with the mood in mosshaslehurst’s Property Team. We remain very busy [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Newspapers are reporting that Britain has officially returned to recession.  Straight away, speculation has focused on fears for house prices saying that consumer confidence is already weak and that this news will damage it even further.<br />
Such doom and gloom is not consistent with the mood in mosshaslehurst’s Property Team.  We remain very busy – and new conveyancing instructions remain high.  However, bad news attracts press headlines and travels fast – it’s as though the papers almost talk the market down and ignore any optimism.  The real danger is not the ‘double dip’ but that such talk could become a self-fulfilling prophecy.  Despite little economic cheer throughout the UK in 2011, overall house prices were stable and the buy-to-let market thrived!  Those economists creating alarm and predicting steep falls will hopefully be proved wrong.  A big fall in house prices is hardly in this Country’s best interests…</p>
<p>mosshaselhurst Solicitors</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mosshaselhurst.com/blog/?feed=rss2&#038;p=710</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What is a Local Search?</title>
		<link>http://mosshaselhurst.com/blog/?p=699</link>
		<comments>http://mosshaselhurst.com/blog/?p=699#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2012 16:20:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jeannette Kemp</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[commerical property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Local Authority]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[local search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mosshaselhurst solicitors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[property purchase]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mosshaselhurst.com/blog/?p=699</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Almost all transactions involving the purchase of a property (and this includes residential as well as commercial properties and/or unoccupied land), will require a Local Authority Search to be carried out as part of the conveyancing process. A Local Authority Search is a vital link in the conveyancing process and can reveal important information about [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Almost all transactions involving the purchase of a property (and this includes residential as well as commercial properties and/or unoccupied land), will require a Local Authority Search to be carried out as part of the conveyancing process. </p>
<p>A Local Authority Search is a vital link in the conveyancing process and can reveal important information about the property you wish to buy.<br />
It is carried out by referring to information and records held by the Local Authority in whose borough or parish the property is in (i.e. the Local Council for that area)</p>
<p>The Local Search is comprised of up to four parts:<br />
The main part (usually a minimum requirement) is a form called the LLC1, which will provide a list of all of the relevant entries held in the Local Land Charges Register.<br />
The second part (usually referred to as the Con29R) will provide information on, amongst other things, details on planning applications relevant to the property (whether granted or refused), building control history, any enforcement action, restrictions on permitted development, nearby road schemes, contaminated land and radon gas; in all a total of 13 subject areas. These two elements together are often referred to as a &#8216;basic&#8217; or &#8216;standard&#8217; Local Search.<br />
Thirdly, you can also ask optional additional questions relating to public rights of way, areas of outstanding natural beauty, pipeline, pollution notices, or town and village greens. These questions (18 in all) are contained on an optional form, which is usually referred to as the Con29O.<br />
Lastly, you can use the Search Application to ask the Council anything else which you think may be useful to know about, such as whether there are any planning permissions on adjacent land. These questions, in common with the optional enquiries mentioned above, will be at additional cost.  The cost varies from Council to Council.</p>
<p>Whilst it is rare for a Local search to reveal anything too serious, when an entry is found it can sometimes prove expensive to remedy &#8211; and may affect your decision on whether to continue with your purchase.</p>
<p>mosshaselhurst Solicitors</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mosshaselhurst.com/blog/?feed=rss2&#038;p=699</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Strasbourg reform ‘watered down’</title>
		<link>http://mosshaselhurst.com/blog/?p=693</link>
		<comments>http://mosshaselhurst.com/blog/?p=693#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2012 13:30:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Emma Roberts</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brighton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Europe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[human rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mosshaselhurst solicitors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Strasbourg]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mosshaselhurst.com/blog/?p=693</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The coalition’s blueprint for the reform of Europe’s human rights court in Strasbourg achieved only limited changes after proposals to help clear the backlog of more than 150,000 cases were watered down or removed during negotiations. Proposed sanctions against states that persistently fail to execute the court’s judgments were scrapped, as were plans to appoint [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The coalition’s blueprint for the reform of Europe’s human rights court in Strasbourg achieved only limited changes after proposals to help clear the backlog of more than 150,000 cases were watered down or removed during negotiations.</p>
<p>Proposed sanctions against states that persistently fail to execute the court’s judgments were scrapped, as were plans to appoint more judges to help handle the caseload, lawyers said. The Brighton declaration on the future of the European Court of Human Rights, adopted by the 47 member states of the Council of Europe last week, sets out a framework for ensuring that states properly implement the European Convention on Human Rights within their own jurisdictions.</p>
<p>A proposal to amend the convention to include the principles of ‘subsidiarity’ and the ‘margin of appreciation’ was rejected.</p>
<p>However, the conference adopted the declaration’s least controversial proposal &#8211; to reduce the time limit to apply to the court from six months to four. It also adopted a tightening of admissibility criteria.</p>
<p>mosshaselhurst Solicitors<br />
Northwich 01606 74301<br />
Winsford 01606 592159<br />
Wilmslow 01625 538816</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mosshaselhurst.com/blog/?feed=rss2&#038;p=693</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

